Skim sites like National Black Foot Soldier Network and NiggaKnow, or spend a few hours on a tube dedicated to black “culture,” if you can’t grasp David Starkey’s contentions. Negro “culture” is not a culture, but an attitude problem.

A tour de horizon of Black attitude is unnecessary. The absence of culture is its testament. Who bothers with Maya Angelou, and Langstone Huges? Hip-Hop and Slam are what a little nigger knows how to recite. The rare Black lawyer does no better by claiming that Rap is an art form and Slam contests the equivalents of the Delphic games.

Only idiots need to be reminded of Negro failure. Black violence is aimed at Blacks. Black illiteracy, is the crucible of Blacks. Alcoholism, drugs, prisons, hopelessness, exaggerated assertiveness, little in terms of scientific or cultural success. NBA and MTV? Two acronyms don’t cut it. And Niggers know this, and Niggers hide it, and Niggers blame Whitey.

Underlying Negro failure is an attitude problem. It is only with the direct  intervention of the state, a muscled interference in the day-to-day dealings of non-blacks with Blacks, that Negroes can find the privilidge of disconnecting the failure of their conduct, from the failure of their attitudes. The privilege of ostracising the likes of Thomas Sowell and Juan Williams, and bestowing boundless adulation on coons like Oprah Winfrey and Jesse James Jr.

Relying on coercive legal measures, preferential executive policies, racist congressional law, and a well established ideological praetorian guard of vigilantes among the punditocracy, Negroes can have their cake, and eat it too.

The gluttony has its logic, and it can be summarised by just four points. These four points make their appearance in the national consciousness about  a zillion times a day in a million permutations:

1) Everything is controlled by Whites. The money, the television, the liquor stores, the music industry, the news, everything is ruled by Whites and for Whites. From what a cell phone looks like, to what enters a Nigger’s mind!

2) This White rule is inimical to that of Negroes. White  animosity to Negroes is called Racism.  Racism is the cause of all the blights upon the Negro. From the Nigger’s animalistic rage, to his lack of success, its all the fault of the White man’s racism.

3) It has been so from time immemorial. Because he was an exploitative Racist, when the White man discovered the Negro he enslaved him. He saw and used  him as a beast. When the Negro wasn’t useful any more, the White man threw him overboard. Now he wished the Negro would just disappear.

4) There can be no possible future for the Negro. As long as the White man dominates, the Negro is relegated to the shadows, if not for extinction. But even if the Whites were to disappear tomorrow, they have already done the job of annihilating the Black. Five hundred years of brutal genocidal exploitation, have handicapped the Negro to an extent, that he can no longer survive in any circumstances.

As extreme as these positions sound, these are not the postulates of a small fringe of the Negro community. They are, in one form or another, the bread and butter of a comprehensive spectrum not only of Negro society, but of most White and Non-White society accross the Globe.

Muslim Imams reaching out to Blacks in America, Australia, and London preach it. CNN, Russia Today, Al-Jazeera, and every  global based television network give it credibility.  The story of the raping and pillaging of Sub-Saharan Africa by White colonial powers, is the ubiquitous and only narrative of the history of this world and the Negro Diaspora which it has birthed.

Blacks riot in London, Atlanta, Paris, and Praeotoria? Even the possibility that their conduct deserves the appellation of “savagery” is proscribed by law! The colour of the Savage’s skin assures that his crimes are given a free pass or are generously justified in every single publicly observable discourse of the last 20 years!

You an angry Nigger? Burn a street, and rape a bitch! No worries, it’s  the fruit of 400 years of abuse! Steel a car and pimp a ho? Whitey wants you in prison!  Flip a burger and get shit pay? Whitey controls the resources.

These are not the excuses of a few ne’er-do-wells! These are notions  to which every Negro to the last standing man and woman appeals on a daily basis either mentally, or outwardly. These notions are  the bridge  between himself and his White colleagues. The White Narcissists entourage of Negro hipsters, is the  bread and butter of the Narcissistic ego; a beautiful symbiosis of the Black Inferiority Complex, and White Narcissim.

Educated Negroes, the very few who are supposedly the hope of both Whites and Negroes, either subconsciously or openly advocate some version of the above four points. Be they lawyers, journalists, or car salesmen. Be they of a dark or subtle hue. Beautiful or ugly. Loved by Whites, or surreptitiously despised. Be they the kind who possess the  ghetto stare of a  gang-banger, or the guilt-stare-down of a Negro mother  whaling over her son’s death.

They smile to their non-Black neighbors, they appear on television and chit-chat about the latest gossip, they drink coffee with associates and complement a little white baby on the playground? All of them, to the last, are in the clutches of a Freudian or openly Marxist prison of Historical Passivity.

Negroes aren’t the actors in world history. Merely its victims. None so more than of the White man. The lecherous, depraved, genocidal White man.

From Oprah Winfrey to even conservative Negro commentators like Thomas Sowell, the Negro has forgotten all possible alternative explanations of his own origin. He sees no connection between that origin and who he is today. He can never resists the explanation that the decrepid status of his fellow Negroes is explained by the  enslavement of Blacks. The only difference between Thomas Sowell and Sista Soulja, are the degrees to which their belief in the inborn abilities of Blacks permits either of them them to emphasize the importance of Slavery in keeping Blacks down.

David Starkey says black ghetto culture is responsible for recent violence in England. What Starkey ignores, is that all modern culture references the Black in uniquely passive terms. It is mainstream non-black culture, rather than simply ghetto culture, that  not only excuses Negro savagery, but in and of itself is a source of Negro impunity. Like ghetto culture,  general non-black culture  lacks any perspective other than some vague mainstream version of the above four points, when faced with Blacks. It too, interfaces with the Negro, via the ideology of Racism, or more precisely, anti-Racism.

Anti-Racism’s obsession is with Whites. With every word, thought, and action of Whites. Because the emotions it elicits are grossly negative, running the gamut of outrage to consistently encouraging homicide, the driving force of Anti-Racism is hatred of Whites.

The hatred is made invisible, by a simple magic trick – the four points enumarated above! As passive victims, as handicapped rejects of modern society, perpetually persecuted for their Negritude,  Negroes are secured omnipresent innocence. They are free of any responsibility for any, not one single act, which they commit against themselves, or non-Blacks.

Black attitudes mean that Negroes are circumscribed in their deailng with Whites. They will eventually find themselves handicapped in dealings with all non-Blacks. Negroes can’t  transcend the filter of Racism in dealing with Others. They are surrounded by an anti-White mosquito net of Racism, so that Negro history is reduced to this term, and this term only, and all human interaction must either become black, i.e. deprived of culture, or it is Racist and Anti-Black! As long as we’re talking energy and spontaneity, that’s cool. Bring in complicated cultural references, especially White, and it ain’t black! Therefore it’s anti-Black.

The history carried by the Negro, is how the Negro defines himself relative to everyone he comes across. Within the Negro community, he has sustained this obsession by interpreting all his considerable difficulties, with anti-White excuses. This is his code, among brothers. Vis a vis Whites, the Narcissists have assured him they speak his language. They get it. They understand  his attitude towards Whites requires their guilt, and humbleness.

The list of Negro complaints against the White World — for the Negro always assumes that the World as known to other men, is only the White World as known to Negroes–  is infinite. Negroes need special protection from every force in their environment, lest they are to survive from day to day without murdering someone. This protection is amply proffered by  acknowledging  that Racism keeps them chained and shackled. The  the litany of their complaints is attentively broadcast, and they are allowed to ululate as Savages lest they sound as whiners.

To the Negro mind, regardless of pedigree, Racism is the White ideology which gives Whites the power Negroes so perspicaciously observe them to have. Racism explains why Colonialism not only took  place, but why the underlying structure of the Nation State, of the World Economy, and of Civilisation itself, is rigged agaisnt Negroes. By removing Racism, you radically transform all of Society. Rremove  its Whiteness, and you automatically find yourself with a Negro friendly environment.

The patent inanity of this Negro attitude-thought-complex,   is the reason why a long list of Negro issues with the surrounding world, is a tedious, redundant, and crack-pot superfluity. Four points, merely four points predict and explain Negro culture from the ground up.

The irony is that the vast majority of Whites  who share in this  culture by acknowledging it on a daily basis, become  the ultimate opportunity for Negroes to croon “See, I told ya Whitey was out to get us!”

In this, the brothers are  correct. Whites don’t give a hoot about Negroes and would rather have them evaporate, then spend another dime or minute of their time trying to figure out how to deal with the Horrific Legacy of their own Hatred of black skin!

After all, isn’t that why it’s easier to belief the imbecilic prattle of a pre-literate society? Isn’t it the reason why most Whites (with the exception of a small fringe whose motivations are as varied as their political outlooks) believe that their world is a Nigger’s Hell. Isn’t it why they created the Negro fairy tale, in the first place?

You want us to be white!? What da fuck fou nigga!?

David Starkey set off a furor in Albion. When homes burn, Whites must bear it stoically! When Whites identify the race of the arsonists, Narcissist and Negros get spitting mad! This emotional imbalance spells something obvious. To paraphrase Enoch Powell,  in some way “the black man already has the whip hand over the white man.”

The outrage of the Narcissists and Negroes over Starkey’s remark betray their  radical anti-White partisanship, and their deep sympathies with the forces of violence. Starkey merely pointed out the Negro origin of the riots! He reiterated that it was started by Blacks, and that Black “culture” was, in his opinion, the cause of England’s social collapse. One blog calls such formulations of fact, hate facts. The Clash of Races hypothesis calls them collisions.

While the BBC patrols the streets censoring those who dare tell us that the rioters aren’t White, the British bleat in unison that the looters are rather impolite, a bit dodgy, and perhaps poorly coiffured! Starkey raises his voice, and  he’s body-slammed right and sundry without a single voice of support in our free, democratic, and oh so full of variety media!

The mental imbalance is deep, very deep. Freud is rolling in his grave. The suppression is volcanic.

People who partake in the looting and destruction of England do not merit anything but the vilest epithets and cursing. They must, by every law of decent human civilisation, be called everything and anything which denigrates, humiliates, and express total outrage at their conduct, at their persons, and and their attitude!

Just not on the BBC please. What you do in the privacy of your own home, is your own business. Tea and crumpets, anybody?

This was no multicultural youth of England storming the streets in a bread riot, these were savage Niggers, shit-faced apes smashing and terrorizing Civilisation into submission! To call it otherwise, is submission. David Starkey called them black. He was immediately asked to recant and submit.He didn’t. This blog will call it shit-faced savagery, because free thought is by definition incompatible with submission. Apes of the largely non-White  variety flexing their muscles, shitting down everyone’s throats, starkly proclaiming themselves kings of an environment they are systematically degrading to a jungle!

The Negro riots of England began due to the justified gunning down of a piece of shit nigger thug. Rather than shaming their criminal tendencies,  his community, Nigger women, men, children, and adults, decided to burn half of England.

The Negress began with personal aspersions that Starkey was diving England between an us and a them. The Chav chaffed that Starkey spoke of blackness as analogous to evil. The moderator took the mention of race, as an affront. Starkey had merely observed that Black ghetto culture militates against education, and is a bit too stuck on violence.

The Crash of Races hypothesis maintains that Black “culture” is an oxymoron. The distinction between Black Ghetto culture and a general Black culture is superfluous. Africa’s pop-music is as distant from Reggae and Rap, as Hip-Hop is to the Viennese Waltz. African blacks are not the Niggers of the White World, they work for a living, and are realistic about their failings. A statue of Leopold stands in Kinshasa, no matter the confabulating fancy of the Narcissist Adam Hochschild! But none of this  changes that Niggers and Negroes and Blacks, do not have anything which constitutes a culture in the proper meaning of the term.

This blog has discussed Negro history in multiple posts (1, 2, 3, 4) a history akin to that of Papua New Guinea. Pre-agricultural and without basic social organization. The blog has also described the process of Niggerification, a process by which Negro lack of culture is undoing the culture of others, undermining not only norms of behavior and communication, but more importantly, the very emotional nature of those undergoing niggerification.

For millenia, the Dark continent was cut off from contact with Civilsiation. The closest thing its inhabitants had for neighbors were Gorillas and Chimps. Two World Wars have caused Whites to renounce White culture, and unsurprisingly they are now unlearning how to buckle their belts, and confuse their thighs for their waist. They speak with monkey like hoots and intonations, and instead of walking they swagger like apes. The change is written on their faces. Instead of calm and inviting expressions, they sport a tight lip and the “Nigger stare-down.” If Negroes can’t recite poetry, and their offspring in London are limited to Rap songs, non-Blacks somehow feel invited to ignore Shakespeare and Blake. They no longer compete for graces and courtesy of the faie sex. Their consumption of pornography has convinced them that White women are now more interested in suckin a Big Black Cock (BBC) in front of a pansy White or Asian man recording an interracial cuckold on camera!

Mr. Starkey misses a central problem in his Black culture argument. Not having Culture, Blacks are stuck with Attitude and must make ado with Energy. Whites have reached the pinnacle of civilisation, and inebriated on its heights by renouncing the latter and significantly altering the former. Once at the top of the pinnacle, they became enamored with all things which precede it. Spontaneity, vitality, charisma, energy, nature..wants, desires, impulses, dreams, and fantasies. The primitive was good, the savage was genuine.

The Negro, was always pliable. He isn’t the piper nor does he pay for one. He dances to the tune the Whites play on their radios. Whites decided they needed to listen to Niggers. Some though the pinnacle was too high, they got dizzy, and acrophobic. They descended to earth, but lacked the energy, the vitality, and the charisma to compete with Real Niggers. A few others invited the Negro up to the pinnacle. The Negro couldn’t seem to make it, since his music was already dominating the airwaves, and his music was all about an attitude, antagonistic to climbing. He could bang drums, his women could shake their asses, he knew how to posture and how to express outrage. He couldn’t do opera, or read a classical score, and it got real lonely at the top. Just look at Starkey, if you aren’t convinced.

A few basic hate facts, for the Negress, the Chav, and the Moderator. The Negress knows her power lies in her impunity. She can accuse Starkey of dividing, and Narcissists will applaud her. She is allowed to be outraged by his comments because he is White and she is a Black Victim of his White Patriarchal past.  She shows no outrage that her fellow Niggers nearly burned down London. She gets personal because she has taken personally Starkey’s remark about Blacks. She is keenly aware who is they, and who is us. Her us, is unadulterated. She knows her fellow Niggers started the riot, and she knows they wont stop until there’s nothing left to destroy, and she knows she’s instrumental in making it possible. Like 99.9% of Negroes, she feels no connection whatsoever to any non-Black history or community. Slavery is her interface with the non-black world. She bears nothing but resentment for a system which she’ll vengefully see destroyed. She is allowed to, by the Narcissists. Who encourage her to pursue her Nigger attitude.

The Narcissistic Chav is a mediocrity waiting for a Road to Damascus moment when he’ll be sporting Nazi regalia. He’ll remain a mediocrity. The moderator, is in the worst situation. She’s expected to play by a set of rules whose transgression will amount to her total ostracizing from the social circles to which she is now a prisoner. A fall from grace which coupled with her visibility, will result in violent crime against her person. The Negress will be there to justify it, and accuse her of having asked for it.

Like all her cousins, little  shit-faced thugs rampaging in the boroughs, she’ll spit in your face, as you lie dying on the ground. Reminding you, that you forgot to kiss her ass, before opening your mouth and stating the obvious.

Let’s cry over 100 victims! Let’s send them indispensable post-disaster aid! For the second time in 20 years a White man (that’s right, White!) commits an act of terrorism. An opportunity for legitimate outpouring of hatred against non-PC whites which simply cannot be missed! Hitch up the horses Ethel, it’s a Gold Mine! Non-white rape of Norwegian girls is leading crazy Crackers to blow up crazy Honkies! Yeeehaaaaa!

Did anyone expect a non-White monopoly on terror into the 21st century? They mention DNA when they need a prescription, but they can’t be bothered when looking into the mirror! Ignore your fears and hatred, pretend only others are human!

Oslo isn’t unique in its violence. It’s unique for two reasons. A White man was behind it, and it’s a unique opportunity for White Narcissists to lash out at other Whites.

For the second time in 20 years a white guy went for the 72 virgins shtick. In typical stupid white fashion he forgot that the victims were supposed to be infidels, i.e. the one’s raping white girls, not the one’s being raped! But since white girls often claim they deserve non-white rape as remittances for historical white sins, where else but inward can a cracker turn the process of niggerification? After all, doesn’t’ he take his cues from Narcissistic White intellectuals?

The very act of terrorism is a symptom of the decline of white identity. A conversion to non-white notions. It does not fit any modern white behavior pattern. It amounts to an expression of self-hatred which can only lead to the murder the victims of rape (the self), while suppressing mere malaise with those who commit the rapes!

Why stir the pot, when it’s easier to pick on the weak by calling them traitors and shooting them through the head? Raising these issues will land a white person in a prison with the very darkies whose love knows no bounds!

Honkies will probably get the victims right the next time. In a few years they will grow up in environments indistinguishable from a favela in Sao Paolo, and will finally assimilate to non-white low-class culture to the point of getting their targets right!  Wait another 10 years, terror watchers! After ten years and 10,000 instructive non-white terrorist acts the lesson will finally sink in into those stupid white heads!

The second reason Oslo is unique, is because of the terrific opportunity it provides for Mass Hysteria and Righteous Vilification of Whites.  An opportunity for one group of extremists — White Narcissist and their insecure non-white allies– to attack their mirror opposites, the insecure Whites. Since White Narcissists are infinitely convinced of their normalcy, it is impossible for them to resist an orgy of hatred of their little white bigot relations.

What is surprising if a handsome Freemason and supposed conservative Christ-worshiper concocts conspiracies of Knight’s Templar and plots out European history into 2083?

Hatred is normal. And violence too. The inability of Europe, and White Narcissists to understand this normality, is the aberrant Elephant in the Room!

While the media pour over an avowed killer’s manifesto, seeking to discredit everything right of the center on the political spectrum, they will do nothing but increase the intensity and inevitability of a Crash of Races . Behind the seemingly benign discussion of Islam and  Right Wing Christianity, lies the tendency of European elites to manage their way out of identity issues through predictable Freudian processes of denial, regression, counter-transference, projection, and externalization.

Oslo will not be used not to discuss the issue facing White Europeans in an increasingly difficult world. It will not lead to greater respect for their voices on a continent which is historically theirs. It will be used to further divide, vilify, and radicalise opposition to the White Narcissist denial of reality.

What could have served as a reflective moment to discuss the logic of radicalisation of a seemingly cultured and reserved young man, will become a Salem witch hunt aimed at destroying even the most innocuous forms of non-Narcissistic White thought.

White Narcissists have an issue with reality. The mere air of being progressive, endows them with a moral superiority rendering them oblivious of basic human nature. That this callousness can lead to anything but increased violence is as pathetic a delusion, as is the hypocrisy of those who bomb others in the name of democracy,  but refuse to provide more than managed dialogue in the realms they rule.

Nearly 100 years ago, Europe began a descent into violence which resulted in two terrifying genocidal wars that left nearly 70 million dead, and witnessed the elimination of Europe’s best minds. The dynamics behind this savage brutality were the same as the those which presage future calamity.

Three camps oblivious to anyone but themselves. Each convinced of the extremism of the other. The Communists thought Fascists as nothing but reactionaries; the Conservative concern for family and values, a mere product of middle class monstrosity. The Right gazed upon the Communists and witnessed an aggressive ideology bent on depriving them of property, of continuity, of stability. They saw danger in a messianic radicalism which had bombed and tortured its way to power. Between the two “extremes” stood the intellectuals, the opportunists, the public men who palliated with literature, classical music, and notions of propriety, lacked the emotional energy necessary to view either side in the conflict as anything but deranged; forgetting that their own neutrality was itself a form of privilege paid for by the lives of lower-class whites in exchange for middle-class tax remissions, i.e. the policemen, Pinkertons, law-and-order types, scabs, etc.

Today, the White World wants to remain oblivious to the results of its own Narcissism.  Preaching Freud on the one hand, and ignoring his most basic lessons about civilisation, is a feat of mental gimmickry that would make Copperfield jealous.

While there is something unexpected in the ability of a young White man to slaughter nearly 100 of his countrymen — almost incomprehensible considering a lack of military experience or any violent precedent in the subject’s biography– such aberration was to be expected. The predictability that the reaction of Europe’s elites will only encourage such acts further, is almost as farcical as is the short-sightedness of this reaction.

Aside from a suspicion of a false flag operation, the eerie sensation that such violence is inevitable derives from precisely the manner in which Freudian mechanisms of denial and suppression produce surprise, outburst, and Crashes, rather than Clashes, or gradual Evolution.

No matter what words Narcissistic Whites and Non-Whites choose to describe the conduct of the White terrorist in Oslo, they will obstinately refuse to reference Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood oration. They will deny any and all responsibility of any possible link between their progressive ideology, and that of the Terrorist.  In a fit of historical amnesia they will vilify as a terrorist calumny , the mere suggestion that their outlook has led to policies that were explicitly anti-white and anti-democratic.

But democracy is not a choice, it is a necessity. Suppressing the needs of the productive majority, claiming that such needs are irrational, ignorant, and dumb, presumes the right of kings. That a continent, which contrary to all its garish prattle of “Democratic Values” has no more than 60 years experience with the notion of Democracy, and two millenia with pure Despotism of Kings whose subjects went by the name of servioi and esclavoi, so quickly reverts to forms of established Tyranny, is no  surprise. Behind every learned white intellectual’s pince-nez hides the arrogance of his Narcissism and Privilege. That the price of his privilege will be paid by the lives of simple and honorable people, white and non-white alike, is a historical constant with which he can hardly be bothered.

The value of post-colonial studies was to emphasize the racial nature of intellectual privilege. Narcissistic Whites accepted this dogma, but conveniently transferred the debt of this privilege off their backs! They drew the dubious conclusion that recalcitrant Whites deserved to be robbed of all their rights due to disagreement with colonial guilt while they – the Narcissists – could maintain their White privilege by virtue of their agreement with the dogma of post-colonial studies!

The non-White world suffers the burden of toil and unemployment, from which the the White world benefits via oppressive pleasure seeking and a chosen avoidance of work. The Narcissist answer is to ignore this relationship and merely beat non compliant non-whites through outsourcing to Chinese slave labour. Discontent Whites will be vilified and made guilty by association with some nutter in Oslo. They will be provided with free IPhones to coax them from even thinking that a part of this nutter’s logic, wasn’t anywhere as nutty as the wet-fantasies of White Narcissists are already proclaiming them to be. The same Narcissists who don’t have to deal with the question of non-whites raping whites in Europe, which is conveniently beyond their pale!

Instead of turning inwards, to face their own inner daemons, Narcissistic Whites the world over, will demonize those that dare voices similar concerns to the Terrorist of Oslo, because they’ll claim such concerns lead to violence. That these concerns are born from the same Stalinist conditions which produced the Terrorist, will be immaterial. The White Narcissist who created this world, wears the mask of Stalin. No one is allowed to complain. According to White Narcissists, complaints will now be signs of terrorists intentions.   Those who dare question the new Stalin are all part of subversive plot, and will subsequently be tortured to confess their Racist and Nazi affiliations!

White Narcissists will do anything in their power to further raise tensions in inverse proportion to the intensity of their Freudian terror of assuming their genetically given identity. Assuming failure on their part  would presume they admit that fellow Whites throughout the world are being forced to exchange increasingly useless economic advantages in favor of total and absolute political annihilation. Such an admission is impossible for the White Narcissists, because it would undo his privileges of voting left and preaching White Guilt,  while snorting cocaine in an all-white dinner party in some swanky neighborhood of London, Paris, or New York; the token black hipster, included.

If the process of the political annihilation of Whites did not involve the total rewriting of history, and was possible without serious psychological costs to the general White population, the Narcissistic vision would have been feasible. But because it is based  on an externalization of suppressed pathology, just like their cocaine habit, someone will have to pay for its continuation.

White Narcissists are the creators of the terrorist of Oslo. He is the manifestation of their disease. As they annihilate their own people to maintain their privilege, they employee Stalinist political disenfranchisement through exaggerated vilification of their opponents. In calling everyone who disagrees with multiculturalism and diversity a bigot and Nazi, they produce the very terrorism required to give their own “enlightened” extremism an air of normalcy.

It is a vicious circle, from which there is no escape. The disease of White Narcissism results in  obtuse arrogance. They soothe their egos with symbolic gestures to non-whites. These gestures only have meaning if there is a Nazi around the corner. To create a Nazi, they externalize their own extremism in the most disenfranchised population of the day – Whites.

Far from being a mere conflict between the Right and the Left, the Christian vs. the Muslim, it becomes a Racial conflict of genetics. Of deoxyribonucleic acid, of the nucleotides  of Adenine, Cytosine, Thymine, and Guanine.   Oslo is the great opportunity for this conflict to progress,  and wherever it explodes in France or in California, is  a question of when, not how.

The Crash is On and the rules are simple. Genetics, demography, and territory. Young males white and non-white are overwhelmed by their hormones. The arrogant solution is to tranquilize them via pharmaceutical fantasy.

Combine a braggadocio adventure in a corridor linking Sub-Saharan African populations and the Mediterranean, with the pressure resulting from state mismanagement of white self-awareness, and imagine the potential of this powder keg!

So how will it all go bang?

All predictions presuppose error. Saying that the sun rises carries an infinitesimal risk of error. Giving the place and time of the start of a Racial War, requires a bucket of salt.

The basic argument for France serving as the epicenter of a Racial War scenario has already been given in the previous two posts. France has a unique history of revolutionary fervor, and is  equally unique in its enforcement of White Narcissism.

With the granting of political rights to negroes in the second half of the 20th century, Racial consciousness, or its suppression, defines 21st century identities in a handful of developed polities.

Africa, a negro continent fructified and simultaneously pillaged by White overlords, remains as marginal to the Racial War, as do Russia, or China. It is societies with negro populations and liberal democracy, that a Racial consciousness necessary for Racial War is present.

Just as it is impossible for anything but a racial fist-a-cuffs take place in Vladivostok or in Harrare, there are three objective criteria which rank America, France, and England, as the only possible sites for a Race War to commence.

The first criteria is the population distribution of non-whites among whites. Two, the degree of political liberalism of the country, and three, the role of white narcissism within this politically liberal sphere.

America’s chance of a race war, peaked in 2008. Barring a repeat of these elections in 2012, in which Race Baiting carried Obama to the White House, this threat subsides with each year that the Hispanic displaces the negro. The segregated nature of America’s housing  remains the cynosure of the country’s insulation from a Race War.

England, a once proud owner of 1/4th of the globe, is now serviced by American security institutions, which can be leveraged by English elites to stop any potential unrest in its tracks.  England is a nation whose White nature has been left to the hands of skinheads and hoodlums because its internal stability is in the care of Washington.

France, remains the only candidate country with sufficient national independence to prevent extra-territorial interventions in its body politic, by either the United States, or any other international entity.

Within such uniquely French conditions, the French Republic has developed its own idiosyncratic political approach for tackling negroes. The motto “liberty, equality, and brotherhood” is understood to mean that no extra-national identity is allowed.

Apart from the abstract notion of French-hood, no one, be they Jewish, Shia, Black, or Arab, can count on any official recognition of anything, except their nationality.

While making the likes of Affirmative Action absolutely impossible, it also implies the total non-existence of either French whites, or  French blacks.

40  years of de facto Socialism assured the country that negroes would surround anaconda-like the city of Paris, and be implanted in high-rise low-income housing in each and every village in order to satisfy the football ambitions of the local mayor!

France’s crime rate is non-white. It’s prisons are non-white. While Sarkozy, who is supposed to ignore the existence of race officially declares race-mixing the state’s policy, the French countryside and French cities are terrorized by a foreign criminal culture. Having unleashed a war on Libya’s Qaddafi, France is now faced with a tidal-wave of new recruits for this criminal import.

In 2005, the death of two useless non-white thugs who would rather incinerate themselves than allow polite white French police to question them, set off a week of violent non-white rioting.

The nature of the rioting was quintessentially French. By exposing the power of the new non-white French criminal culture in the face of a disappearing state it exemplified the traditional distance between French fantasy and French reality.

Greece is beating its blacks, because there are hardly any there and they’re already an irritant. Libya is beating its blacks, because Lybians are allowed to assert their non-black identity on a regular basis. It’s only a mater of time, before the blacks take to beating their whites, and that will happen in the country  where blacks have that unique opportunity.

What will it take to set them off? A sunken boat of Africans fleeing across the Mediterranean? A stern refusal by Sarkozy to open the flood gates to further Africanisation? Another black or non-white thug who fries himself on an electric fence? Or the plausible victory of the National Front in the elections?

Whatever it takes, France is the place holding the dynamite stick.  Paris isn’t Athens, and it’s not Tripoli, but it is the single biggest creditor to the first, and the biggest bully of the second. A default in Greece means a slowdown in France. A defeat in Lybia, is no different than victory – more and more non-white immigrants.

A casual look at the modern “post-racial” French male reveals a curious physical pattern. The virile ones, are not white. Those who are polite, well-mannered, and sport fancy haircuts, are neither black nor Arab.

While the white French 20 something male spends his time making love, smoking pot, and studying in college, his black counterpart is exchanging blows with Arabs and developing street-smarts while selling the pot to the white kid whose dad is chasing him for transgressing the law.

French non-whites now enjoy a completely monopoly on the means of violence and terror in the country. For a classical Weberian definiton of the state, this implies that the state no longer exists. When a spark lights the fuse French whites will note the color of the machetes that rain down on them, and they will have no one to protect them.

The racial war will begin in France.

Faced with the wicked question of living or dying, French whites will have no choice but to fill the vacuum of  the absurdity of state imposed racial self-denial, with the biologically imperative of survival. French non-whites firmly believe that such an imperative has been bred out of the French white – as they gloat over his inferiority and their presumed prowess. Like the French political elite, they are in for a rude, and vicious surprise;  one that will do no one, any good.

There is a reason history repeats itself. Blind and willful self-denial, programmed in French white DNA, is one such reason. Now, everyone will have to pay.

As with the French Revolution, and the birth of Socialism, France’s transformation of a paradise for non-white thuggery into a grisly War of the Races, will see the world’s oldest state once again set the tempo for the global agenda.

Obtuse as always, the Sceptered Isles  will be in for a replay of 1066. America will have to choose, whether to play host to a new Napoleon, as Russia did in 1812, or to remain synchronized with the French, as it did in the second part of the glorious 18th century. Cut off from their French intellectual succor, the demise of American White Narcissist, is assured.

The initial New York nerd reaction will be denial, and the claim that “it can’t happen here.” But no number of Obama sponsored kumbaya sessions will change reality. The age of unrestricted immigration  will grind to a halt. Affirmative action will be abolished, and deepening segregation will relaunch the White birth-rate. The prominence of Black American culture will nosedive, and the NBA disappear.

Still, the process of Mexicanisation of America can not be turned back, and the nation will witness the rise of a new non-black non-white component in its elite, which will help  balance it between the world’s two great oceans…hopefully sometime by 2020.

Because the Crash of Races is prevented only by two factors: lack of racial awareness, and the existence of White Narcissism, and France is the epicenter of both. France drew the West into an African war because Qaddafi looked like a push-over, and it would be a cakewalk. France forgot, that one cannot have one’s cake, and eat it.

Historically, when we aren’t leading the world, France is. Under our first non-White president, France is wearing that mantle. It is a conceit to envision history as merely the product of the Anglo-Saxon,  Hebrews, or Chinese. For while America gained her liberty from the British, it was the French Revolution which assured liberty for the rest of the European continent, and hence, the rest of the World.

France has a history  of grandeur and self-delusion, no less intense, but perhaps less dramatic, than our own.  It has a history of pathetic defeat, and glorious victory, and of outstanding glory, and pitiful cowardice. Of gutsy leadership, and humiliating loss. It has a tradition of stubborn denial of reality, and a counter-tradition of bursts of energy where this denied reality transforms France, and via France, the rest of the world into something unrecognizable from the past.

France is the oldest state in the world in a strict historical definition of a State. It is a civilisation in and of itself, part of Western Civilisation, conveniently bridging the Latin South and Germanic North.

France is a culture of state building, and it is its role as a state builder that that make it the likely source of a momentous explosion in the Crash of Races. Under president Sarkozy, France raised the stakes in this traditional project by addressing the question of people-hood.

Tackling the intractable question of assimilation Sarkozy introduced a country-wide dialogue on France’s national identity. Via letters to the editorials of leading dailies, via cronies in the media, and via  government sponsored debates, France became the first nation in the Western world, to attempt to provide its native (i.e. White) population with channels to vent their frustration with non-natives, and to envision a future “together,” i.e. not “apart” from them.

Thinking himself, as befits a pompous French president, a king of the world, Sarkozy naturally underestimated his ability to manage such delicate debates. Their intention was to frame questions of French identity culturally, any mention of race, beyond the Government accepted imperative of race mixing, was strictly chastised; any expression of anti-immigrant sentiment, equally so. Underling  ministers and party whips went out of their way to shut up low level party members who dared deviate from this no-race no-immigration line. But as with all monarchs, Sarkozy forgot one little detail – the remaining opposition of the Front National.

Marine Le Pen, heiress to France’s Front National party, was independent of the president’s party, and an open debate preempted media from refusing her a voice.  In keeping with French tradition, when others mouths are being shut, Marine would open hers. Delicately avoiding Race as an issue, she hit out at immigration,  roiling the president, and forcing a premature closure to the “open” debates.

The French elite is always comically galloping to catch up with the tortoise of its populace, and Sarkozy’s strict limitation on an open discussion backfired. What marked the start of a daring glasnosts unique to a Western world besotted by self-immolating censorship, produced its opposite – greater awareness of the totalitarian limits on  French White identity.

Marine Le Pen’s visit to the island of Lampedusa, coincided with her spectacular rise in the polls, and marks the beginning of the awakening of White France to the numbers of non-whites in their vicinity. The potential for these numbers to increase has been put starkly by the demise of Qaddafi.

Crowding on the shores of Italy, Negroes and unwanted Arabs are either going to increase the cognitive dissonance required of White Narcissists’  Freudian suppression mechanism, or produce the racial self-awareness which presages an inevitable explosion of race relations in the country which until 2005, had been telling everyone not only that Race didn’t exist, but if it did, the French state, French ideology, and French know-how, knew how to make it go away.

So long, la douce France, so long, gay Paree.

The world is preoccupied by an Economic Crisis, by Middle East turmoil, and Japanese radiation. Little does it know, or suspect, that the real explosion sits right around the corner. It wont be economic, it wont be Islam, and it wont be nuclear. It will be Racial, and it might go off in less than a few months.

If the show is to hit the road, then the tinder box required to start the Crash of Races must sit ignored in the middle of a multi-racially crowded Theater.  Good people will reliably keep their mouth shut about the burning fuse, engrossed in a self-congratulatory of sitting next to those of a different skin colour. Right up on stage, a light will festively hiss its way to the TNT box, while white audience members hold their breath in the conviction that not breathing will preempt the racial explosion.

An average  Beduin, Berber, or an Arab, is phenotypically closer to whites, than he is to a Sudanese, Chadian, or Malian. One particular Berber, of appropriate Jewish and Muslim parentage, possessed the non-black agility of mind to regularly ingest a few million Euros  from Italy’s Berlusconi, in exchange for keeping sub-Saharan Negroes out of Europe.

Apart from anecdotal mention of 5 billion Euros, our century of touted free universal access to Information made the straightforwardness of Qaddafi’s bargain impolite for public discussion in the American, European, or any other White public. No comprehensive and publicly available account of the verboten services European conservatives were buying from Qaddafi via their Italian proxy, exist.  Was he sinking boats before they could set sail? Was he shooting Negroes on the border with Niger, Chad, and the Sudan? There’s only so much you can know about a subject, you are not allowed to comment upon, discuss, or acknowledge as existing.

The Devil is in the details; the detail of Lybia being that it is Africa’s shortest corridor between Negro populations of the Sub-Saharan heartland, and the Maghreb.

Whatever Qaddafi was doing, a smiley would say that he’s no longer motivated, nor capable of doing it. The shores of Italy are feeling the pain, and the wheels of a bloody episode in the Crash of Races, are beginning to turn.

To some, it may come as a surprise, that a war started on the very premise of its facility – i.e. started without care for consequences nor for continuity of Qaddafi’s services – should become precisely its opposite, the Beginning of the End of those who started it: the French, the British, and the Americans.

The rise of Marine Le Pen in the French mainstream, following her visit to an Italian port city is pure sulfur.  Her blatant characterization of Europe as a sinking ship, which sinks the faster with each extra needy immigrant, is the grist that will break the mill.

A majority of Non-whites residing in Europe,  and their Narcisstic White handlers, see a Hitlerite mustache under Marine Le Pen’s schnozzle. Modern, post-WWII Europe, has never refused immigrants. Now, in the middle of a war with a nation which divides Europe from the Bantus (i.e. Lybia), a White Christian European dare call for a cessation of this policy. After fifty years of the browning of the continent, such a proposal no longer has the room to go unanswered. This is the fuse.

The tinder box is a France

The Sparks, are a dime a dozen.

Just as with all previous revolutions, what happens in the land of the Franks, will inevitably transform the world as we know it. No one sees it coming, but the film can is already making the rounds. The Theatrical release is but a few months away.

At the start of a new millennium White culture comes in two cans. The Hedonistic European, and the Commercial American. Deprived entirely of any vitality, both promise absolutely nothing.  Niggerism, as the dynamic expression of the Negro spirit produced in Commercial America, steps in to fill the void on both continents.

Whether Negroes are genetically stupid, makes absolutely no difference. Their possible stupidity is only good as it is relevant to the stupidity of others. White European pleasure seekers are by definition mentally limited. Those who confuse commerce with people-hood, i.e. white Americans are obviously not great thinkers. But blame it on the blacks.

Negroes are not a race lacking in energy or talent, and it is not  advisable to confuse America’s ghetto culture, with the full potential of the Negro. As it is not advisable to insist on genetics, when the entire population cohort of the Negro jumped from pre-agricultural economies, straight into the industrial a mere 50 years ago! Imagine Goths and Celts  trying to assimilate to the conditions of post 1950s Detroit!

Commercial America. Rewriting history to make commerce its backbone, children in schools are taught that all ideas are equal, provided they all make a profit. A profit for the psychologically dependent consumer of entertainment, a profit for the spiritual entrepreneur, a profit for the nation’s ideals of national security. As long as it brings us a profit, how can it be wrong?

Good luck convincing the world with the non-conviction of pragmatism. Total pragmatism isn’t an identity, it is the total absence of one.

Hedonistic Europe. Sex, drugs, and fun. NYLon – New York + London ++ Paris, in a Hilton or Intercontinental. Fashion, tourism, and waiting for America to provide all the bombs while the white European middle class slaves away to feed the ne’er-do-well students. Every immigrant who made it across the Middle Sea sweeps Europe’s streets while replacing a European population which no longer needs to reproduce itself.

Good luck, convincing the world with the non-conviction of pleasure seeking. Like its American brother, hedonism isn’t an identity, its the absence of one.

That both White cultures can possibly be related to their predecessors, boggles the mind. These postcards of cultural misery related to Cecil Rhodes, Livingstone, Lyoutay, and Yermak Timofeyevich? Men who shared a passion for the subjugation of ignorance and misery, and the necessary confidence to pursue such a noble passion are the progenitors of these  21st century honky twerps?

Into this thin cultural soup steps in the Negro with his Niggerism. The Negro isn’t limited to his BIC. From the day he was invented , the Negro is keenly aware of certain of his superiority,  advantages, and some of his magic.

Having consigned to the dust-bin all notions of good taste, of physical territory, and of national history, Whites in Europe and America have built the infrastructure necessary for the propagation of Niggerism over their own dead bodies. With no self-identity to speak of, Whites  lack successful models for masculinity; white femininity is beginning to become marginalized, and the lack of reproductive success, promises global impoverishment.

Niggerification is the rise of Niggerism to cultural dominance in the White cultural vacuum. Niggerism can be observed in the following:

• masculinity as defined by the Negro male:
  low behavioral restraint
  false emotional restraint
  lots of show, little to show for it
  posing, posturing
  low reliability, low esteem for results
  lots of indignation
  verbose when aroused, taciturn when disapproving
  importance of body, both sexually and inter-personally
  little in terms of honor
  emotional insecurity
  grimaces, faces, pursed lips, express either lust or negative emotion

• dumbing down of the rational
  rise of the  impulsive, the inspired, improvised
  low effective communication skills,
  emotions used to legitimize a point, supersedes reason
  nauseating repetition over coherence
  emphasis on music, gesture, emotional stamping

• decrease in:
  literacy
  in manners
  in cultivated behavior

• decrease in emotional sophistication and  meditative depth of reflection
  in day to day interaction
  in comprehension and understanding
  in expressive forms

The source of Nigger culture in the Negro, is his pre-agricultural heritage; the complex of cultural expectations, references, and aspirations that define the Negro in the Negro mind. The failure of White culture — for it was the only culture which dragged the Negro out of his habitat– to break the Negro’s pre-agricultural heritage is a contributing factor to the rise of Niggerism. The lack of vitality in White culture, is the prerequisite for Niggerificaiton to take place.

The Negro pre-agricultural heritage selects for physical prowess; selects for aggression and dominance, in the form of emotional posturing and fist throwing. The tradition for males established in the non-black world are weapons. For a modern it is incomprehensible how a camel ridding Bedouin could slave a negro. Forgotten in this historical void, is the awareness that a White of the 17th century could wield an exceptionally efficient fencing sword, not merely efficient against the barbarian tribesman, but equally threatening to a Japanese samurai!

Black males now dominate images of masculinity via sports, combat, and sex. They determine people’s accents, gaits, habits of jeering and threat posturing through music and popular shows.  Dancing has been Niggerised since the 50s, when the traditions of couples dancing, and of coordinated group dancing were replaced by the isolation dancing of the Senegambia, such that today’s clubs and discos are full of drunk mobs rhythmically jumping up and down to the beats of a jungle. When contact is made, it is for dirty dancing or grinding. Rare Negroes in the world of couples dancing are associated with pimps getting their hands on ass by unusual means!

The Negro female has taken most of her cultural cues from an absence of the nuclear family, and is defined by her sexual frustration. Need one repeat that White Aesthetics places no small amount of stress on women of color?  Lacking a culture of emotional self-restraint, the Negress often reminds society of this lack through fits of madness that best resemble observations straight out of Jane Goodall’s notebook. Rihanna and  Naomi Campbell or the secretary and sales clerk with an attitude? Not only is there no going back, this is the way forward!

Sexually, both the black male and female are endowed so that intercourse is largely physical. Courting is reduced to the animalistic. Even the formalities a black couple enjoys around a table, look like foreplay in heat. The female has no tenderness in her eyes, rather the look of a woman who would enjoy something other than a fork between her thick lips!  Compare this to the asexuality of the Asian, and the Romantically inclined and cuddling white. Pornography is now pushing everyone’s mind towards a Blacker model of sex. Towards emotionally disconnected physicality. Interracial porn combined with Negro male sexuality in mainstream entertainment, promises the further intensification of this trend.

Interracial porn tends to follow a White woman/black men model. As more and more couples seek out BBC for their White pleasure, little do they take stock that the White, Asian, or Latina woman has been — on account of the universal male obsession with penis size — transformed into a “cock hungry whore”  completely out of line with her actual feminine nature! The impact of this sexual Niggerification requires its own separate and sophisticated post!

Under the pretext of pluralism, Niggerification knows neither Richard Wright nor Langstone Hughes, but is proficient in baring knuckles and smashing hoops. Its essence is anti-cultural, and  alogical. It increases the attractiveness of shaking  one’s ass and of talking uppity or with head half-cocked. Niggerification is entertainment with the spice of menace sprinkled in. It quadruples the value of entertainment so the Trojan Horse of Commerce is ready to penetrate the  shaved mons pubis of the European hedonistic whore.

Pre-Agricultural societies lack the sophisticated emotional depth required for a Song of Roland or Genji Monogatari. Niggerification amplifies the importance of large gestures, of the caustic, and the menacing, and it leaves only those feelings, which scientist so gleefully identify in the Great Apes as proof of their primate Humanity!

Intellectuals, of nearly every stripe, left or right or center, will sense that some of  Niggerification must be a providential remedy for the moribund culture of the White world. They are advised to listen to less rap. Especially since they adore diversity and variety!

Like nearly all Negro music, rap fails to produce any gamut of emotions beyond the aggressive and tough, beyond the sexual, and fornicating. It has no concept of lightness, of joviality, of gayness, of playfullness. It is deadly serious, like every other artistic expression ever coined by a Negro. Even as comedians, blacks cannot move beyond themselves. They have no universality, they’re always bitter, even at their funniest. Music lovers who limit themselve to rap, inevitably limit all of their cognition to the level of a 15 year old. Even if they are 34 and married twice, their emotional maturity belongs in a sub-woofer.

Niggerism, as an anti-industrial,  and anti-productive culture has the heightened intellectual seduction of being anti-modern, and anti-stultifying. It boasts the charm of energy, of charisma, and of vitality that is long gone from modern White culture.  Niggerism seems to posses all the traits that a Euro-Asian culture dominated by the fastidious gook and the masturbating cracker, needs in order to remain on life support. Niggerism in the form of addictive entertainment makes the Asiatic despotism of indentured servitude in China possible. It’s entertainment which keeps the oblivious Ecstasy popping 24/7 partying Dutch “student” afloat.

Niggerism doesn’t understand nuance, nor depth, nor fidelity. As with most Negroes, the minute a favor is denied, the relationship suffers. Niggerification promises to undo eons of cultural development, which taught children to value the very notion of values! Niggerism is at heart hedonism and pragmatism carried to an extreme in the physically talented body of the Negro. As kids from Vladivostok and Melbourne to Anchorage and Buenos Aires start swaggering like niggers and lisping like 50 cent, those poses, those grimaces, those gestures, reflect the state of their brain. Cerebellums less and less receptive to anything produced by Eurasian culture since 1200 BCE. Fuck Homer, we have Biggie!

The answer to this intellectual fetish for interracial sex,  is simple. Either you can feel a symphony from Dvorak, or you’re part of Niggerification. When all the dust settles upon this world, one such symphony will have far greater value than the countless genocides in which humanity partook in its millenia of Dark existence.  To obsess over these genocides, while becoming unreceptive to the Symphony, is tantamount to obsessing  over failures, rather than praising success.

The gist of Niggerification is to pimp Hedonism and Commercial Pragmatism as the end all and be all. For when men are allowed to naturally acknowledge the superior achievements of Dvorak, they inevitably admit to  the abysmal failure of Negro culture. They find appreciation for the emotional and ideational inheritance of their forefathers, and they end up rejecting the wasteland that is Niggerism. This gives all of them, black, white, non-black and non-white, a greater chance of becoming human. Human in the sense that White men and women, imagined the term from 200 BC.

Oh where is the love indeed?  A mere three months following the Western Hemisphere’s greatest humanitarian disaster, Haiti has slipped from a 24/7 media obsession back to non-existance, with the emotions of patronizing Whites exposed as shantier than the homes of Negroes dying on the forsaken Caribbean hellhole.

The virtual disappearance of Haiti from the news reports, succinctly summarizes the nature of racial relations in the age of the Coming Crash of Races: Fake, Freudian, Duplicitous, and Manipulated.  Perhaps a new bumper sticker is in order: Remember Haiti – since the Alamo is once again  more memorable.

In January 2010, perhaps a quarter million people perished as a result of an ordinary earthquake. This happened right under our very noses in a part of the world  erroneously called the Gulf of Mexico; the Mexican Navy is equal in strength to Denmark’s. It’s 7.o Richter Scale  was equal to tremors which took place in Japan, and inferior to 8.8 which shook Chile.

Compared to 2004 when underwater quakes of 9.0 swelled Pacific Ocean coastal lines into Tsunamis that took a quarter of a million lives along the lengths of the entire Pacific Ocean, the devastation of  a single earthquake localised to the town of Leogane, requires some explanation. But explanations require memory, while politics require action.

Sensing a unique opportunity to play the part of Anti-Bush, the Mulatto in Chief used the possibility of a large Negro death toll in Haiti, to mobilize America’s politically correct emotions into personal political capital. With gestures broad and preened, Obama commanded outpourings of sympathy as sincerely post-racial as the very campaign he waged to enter the nation’s highest office; unique tax loopholes to encourage private American “donations to Haiti,” and 24/7 media bombardment of the country with images and tedious discussions of Tropical suffering.

The tax credits amounted to tax subsidies and losses for a Treasury busily socializing the private losses of fat-cat  robber barons with Americans’ hard earned tax contributions. “Donations to Haiti” implied donations to the Haitian Relief effort, again little more than stealing tax payers money to finance an exercise in Racial Politics by a Mulatto in Chief.

A quick glance at Google’s news timeline reveals that as early as the end of February, Haiti’s news prominence collapsed by a half, and was back on track to its pre-earthquake marginality by mid March; 250,000 million lives,  and incalculable millions spent on mass hysteria and moral chest-beating.  Money thrown at emotional masturbation, and 21st century exercise in social vigilantism.

As with the 2008 presidential election, humans failing to partake in herd behavior were on the lam. Inability to express proper emotions of sympathy for something more appropriately understood as the missing link between troglodytes and the modern homo, attracted suspicion and danger.

Now that the show is over, those who refused to masturbate in public, prove once more, that our interest in “humans” who deliberately refuse to join the ranks of “Humanity,” remains stronger, and more genuine, than the conformists who chucked pennies in the direction of Port-aux-Prince.

As the name would suggest, the city once served as Port to Princes. Negroes are particularly familiar with it, because their equivalent to Bolivar now is part of the name of its main airport. At the start of the 19th century Toussaint L’Overture decimated France’s attempts to retain control of her North American colonies before declaring Haiti the Carribean’s first “independent nation.”  America’s crucial role in assisting Toussaint L’Overture in his revolutionary undertaking will forever remain a footnote. Ignoring L’Overture’s own dictatorial tendencies, Haitian history is best summarized by the title of the man who followed (Dessalines) – “Emperor of Haiti.”

That's right, this isnt a Hollywood production - unlike the fake hystria over Haiti's Earquake, in early 2010.

Four years after its nominal “independence” a Haitian Negro proclaimed himself “Emperor of Haiti.” When a Mulatto educated in Paris tried to reclaim the Republic, Haiti split in two, and another Negro became its “King”. Fast-forward 200 years and its either Papa Doc, the French SOB with his Cote d’Azure villas, or Bertrand Aristide, America’s SOB, today a professor of Zulu living off of South African government pensions, in a massive villa in Pretoria.

Whites Narcissists and Negroes (N&N) trumpet Haiti’s “history”  as prima facie evidence of Blue Eyed devilry. From L’Ouverture’s education in England, to the death of a nephew of Cincinnatus Lacont on board the Titanic, N&N’s attribute all of Haiti’s failure to someone else’s inadequacies. France, America, England, Whites. When a slightly above average earthquake takes a quarter of a million Haitian “lives,” (for is this life?)  Narcissists know where to lay the blame…hint: it’s not their own Narcissim.

One little organisation  appropriate called Love Haiti is around on the web. The verbal tense is unlikely to be in the imperative, but the call for love certainly could be. Those of us who have managed to grown out of either Narcissism or color-based ethnocentrism, remain focused on how much money has gone where (?)  to whom (??)  and done what  (???) while others just brag how great it is to masturbate in front of others.

Masturbation is as useful as a crush, if it lasts a mere two weeks after a massive overdose of government ordained and media orchestrated sympathy. Emotions manipulated to political purposes, in pursuit of shanty and shallow color-coated highs are drug addictions which obliterate both memory, and the capacity for responsible human behavior. Haiti’s coat of arms might serve the antidote. The phrygian cap, hung on a pole growing through a palm tree (?) -  victory booty and mockery of a dead Civilisation.

30 silver coins might buy you fame, but there’s a point where you’ll have to attend a crucifixion. Tax credits and donations can soothe your heart, but its a heart too weak to go on beating throughout the inevitable terror.

Why do You care about a bunch of niggers who deserve a nice earthquake?

Because you are White?

Because you are a Negro?

Because you are neither?

Because you’re an American? A Haitian? An Antillean? A European? An Israeli? An African?

A human?

President Obama spoke of our common humanity in connection to an earthquake which rid the earth of useless mouths. Apparently  “common humanity” implies that all of our mouths are equally useless?

No matter how uncommon our humanity, since when are the successful accountable for the fate of the failed?

By what law are those who create  required to give to those who destroy?

What is the argument, by which you persuade the responsible, that those who breed not just their own misery, failure, and irresponsibility, aught not to suffer the consequences?

Why must the ones who care, attenuate the consequences of those that don’t? To take action for their inaction? To foot the bill for what they ate?

None.

Fuck Haiti, and let it Rot.

Haiti – and similar insults to the human condition – form parts of something all free humans instinctively reject. It’s not up to a politician to tell us the contrary so as to badger free men into servility by commanding our hearts!

Haiti isn’t about poverty or IQ. It’s about common sense. When everyone has it – we’ll talk “Humanity”.

Esthetically Whites are easy to spot. They stand out clear and bright. Even when fat and dirty the corpulence and soot are not part of the original package, and you don’t have to be White to grasp this in a split second. In fact, the darker your own complexion, the faster you grasp it.

White culture, white IQ, white racism, white tastes, white traditions, and a slew of other neologisms, appear amorphous compared to the tangibility of the aesthetics of Whiteness, in whose obverse are born the Darkies.

Darkies are the elites of non-whites, who when confronted with tall blond men or slim Italianate women, choose to politicize the inferiority of their dark complexion and unattractive features.

Instead of accepting the natural order of Beauty that evolution wrought  upon this wretched earth, they radicalize aesthetic discourse into a form of racial struggle.

Notions of “White Beauty” are written off as social constructions, malignantly foisted upon the subjugated coloureds by White Imperialists. The cosmetics industry is an evil White plot to bleach the indigent of distant lands, and Hollywood is but the proxy of Estee-Lauder and L’Oreal spewing subliminal messages of “White is More Beautiful” on unwitting Third World minds.

Whatever the merits of this argument, non-white racial radicals seldom grant the time of day to the proposition that White is indeed more beautiful, and all they need to prove it, is take a good hard look at who they are. In a mirror, for starters.

New technologies promise to forever change the way humans determine the features of their offspring. A predictable chorus of Political Correct Beauty  will pose the biggest challenge to such technologies. Universities will rush to fund Racial Ethics departments tasked with brainwashing the masses to “Embrace Themselves” and “Just say No to White”. The vehemence of these efforts will serve as proof of the universal biological drive behind the triumph of White Beauty.

For if one doubts the existence of Whites, and the validity of their aesthetic superiority, one need merely note  the existence of a vast political industry aimed at destroying the market driven global obsession with porcelain skin. An industry whose size reveals just how profound the Problem of Darkness may be.

The phrenological superiority of Whites over non-whites poses challenges of which Darkies are the ultimate rejectionist enemies. Darkies: the non-whites who in order to embrace who they are, must first step over the corpse of those who they are not; must first negate the White, in order to assert the Dark. Darkies: folks who are stuck destroying something to get nothing, and can embrace their skin only by first rejecting their instincts.

It takes an effort to pretend, that nappy is happy. That flared nostrils and exaggerated smackers are the same as a cute nose and soft lips. That the contrast resulting from black skin and white eyes, is as complex or attractive as that resulting between rosy lips, blue eyes, and brown hair. Beneath all those clothes one also finds larger, and suppler breasts. Less hirsute crotches, and less absurd derrieres. Nor are expressions anywhere as complex and boast the same range of emotional hues on dark faces, as on white.

The mixed races of South America and North Africa may produce the best male figures and nubile female forms – but this doesn’t stop them from striving headlong towards snowy whiteness and the blond;  a passion not limited to Mrs. Morocco and Mrs. Honduras, or to the Turkish soap opera Noor and sultry Brazilian Telenovelas, but openly professed by most Mexicans, Algerians, and Afghans when observed in their native environment unrestrained by Western political correctness.

The Trouble with Darkness starts when identity politics impairs aesthetic judgment. When Beauty is subordinated to crass electioneering.  Darkies are often joined by braying blue-eyed creeps who for reasons of hypocrisy find it impossible to breach the uncomfortable truth to their hyperactive demagogue “friends” that the sheer logic of “authenticity” requires that the Dark must admit its passion for the White or risk losing its wayward soul.

Darkies and their self-denying allies conveniently confound the democratic imperative of political equality with demands for some kind of aesthetic equivalent. But by denying their innermost jealousy and dreams of Whiteness, they simply maintain the lie that their war against Whites, isn’t a war on civilization, and the source of their unearned privileges.