skincolour

Crash, not Clash

In Uncategorized on March 12, 2009 at 11:03 am

h2_wreck

Races are “crashing” not “clashing”. A “clash” implies a degree of orderliness and clarity, absent in the present conflict between racial groups.

Huntington‘s critics have often picked fault with his “Clash of Civilisations” by pointing out that the fault-lines he posited, have yet to flare-up, or enjoy far less action, than clashes taking place within Civilisations. This is due to the presumption of order.

A Crash of Races presumes a disorderly, and subterranean process, in as much as “crash” connotes “accident” and “collision”.

A civilisation is a self-conscious cultural construct, Race is a concrete reality.

Were civilisation to become an acknowledged political factor, one could work from the inside to adapt it.

When race is a political factor, you can only deny it, or encourage it, with no possibility to work on change from any “inside”.  In more than one way, when relevant – race is binary. Culture is rightly viewed as something malleable, race is no such thing. If it becomes important, you are stuck with it, like it or not.

Denying race psychologically, amounts to a simple Freudian suppression, and while it cannot be judged either good or bad on moral grounds, when race is central to politics, its denial gives it the force and power, that only a subconscious force and power can have.

When forces are denied, their collisions are denied and misattributed. Those doing the denying are motivated by good intentions – denying the force, means destroying it. So the thinking, and story goes.

The reality, goes somewhere else. Rather than destroying the force, denying it lends it energy, intensity, and force. When it finally bursts, it becomes more systematic, and deadly, than if it had been operating – and hence combating – in the open. Instead of a Clash, it becomes a Crash, and genocides, holocausts, mass murders were the direct results.

Historically governments who denied, censored, and suppressed conflictual identities, cultivated inevitable catastrophe. The role of political correctness in the rise of someone like Hitler, is too uncomfortable for historians to ponder in their own uncomfortable politically correct environment. Duly – it is denied.

A Crash of Races does not seek to denigrate the importance of parallel, and overlapping conflict. Rather, it considers “competing” hypotheses, such as the Clash of Civilisations, and expansive Islam as part of a broader racial conflict.

Islam is a prime example of a force, which is actively denied and suppressed – hence, whose explosiveness is being actively nurtured.  To claim Islam’s rise to political centre stage  has no racial component, is to ignore the very reason for its ascendancy.

Civilisations, are also fighting, but in ways, far better understood as racial, than cultural. For while Huntington would seek to separate the sphere of Orthodoxy from Protestantism and Catholicism, or a broader Western Civilisation, it is far more parsimonious to analyze the countries where this religion is enjoying a rebirth, from the perspective of racial confrontation, rather than the Orthodox vs Islam.

What Huntington and the anti-Jihadists enjoy, are admissible enemies and fault-lines, hence very little in term of Freudian suppression.

Racial conflict whose very core is Freudian, is over-packaged in layer upon layer of denial, evasiveness, suppression, and cognitive dissonance the likes of which, can catapult a political virgin such as Obama, to the apex of modern political power, and slowly but surely pave the way to eventual catastrophe.

freud

  1. […] the face of it this seems like a logical and laudable politics – driven by a noble denial of race, and a strong desire to transcend it. At its heart, however, lies a narcissistic   white […]

  2. […] pm on March 12, 2009 | # | Crash, not Clash […]

  3. […] data. Is it a politicization of science in order to deal with white narcisism; a way to play their Freudian racial […]

  4. […] have yet to discuss this denial in detail, but we’ve already touched on the fact that as whites undergo global decline, they do not possess, and never did posses – a […]

  5. […] Freudian leitmotif to a Crash of Races, briefly touched upon in Crash, not Clash is incomplete without the mention of the primary handicap that it brings into the day-to-day […]

  6. […] the news reports, succinctly summarizes the nature of racial relations in the age of the Coming Crash of Races: Fake, Freudian, Duplicitous, and Manipulated.  Perhaps a new bumper sticker is in order: Remember […]

  7. […] Arabs are either going to increase the cognitive dissonance required of White Narcissists’  Freudian suppression mechanism, or produce the racial self-awareness which presages an inevitable explosion […]

  8. […] the manner in which Freudian mechanisms of denial and suppression produce suprise, outburst, and Crashes, rather than Clashes, or gradual […]

  9. […] cause of England’s social collapse. One blog calls such formulations of fact, hate facts. The Clash of Races hypothesis calls them […]

  10. […] protracted racial war. Consisting of very limited postulates, it borrows from only three thinkers – Sigmund Freud, Samuel Huntington, and Niall Ferguson. Parsimonious and focused, it avoids detours into […]

  11. […] aside the complexities of a vocabulary borrowing from military theory, from psychoanalysis, and from 19th century European literature, it is evident that Whites at the turn of the third […]

  12. […] between Racial groups has fuelled informal organisational structures.   Informality equals a Freudian […]

  13. […] Crash of Races is about Sigmund Freud, and the dichotomy of the Dionysian and Apollonian. Little could be more fundamental to a global […]

  14. […] world of the Black Inferiority Complex and White Self Hatred. Part of the leitmotiv of the Crash of Races is Non White violence against Whites, and nothing comes closer to presaging its intensity than […]

  15. […] A Crash of Races presumes sudden and gratuitous violence with unprecedented degrees of hatred, confusion, uncertainty, and above all with an extremely sudden impact on the vector of all subsequent development. Sigmund Freud and Greeks deities of orgiastic violence lay out a blueprint of future conflict  beyond the subdued asymmetric manhunts of bearded camel-shaggers. It is the degree to which Racists are the new Witches in the Global Salem which provides the bulk of the argument. […]

  16. […] one more brutal, more direct, less nuanced, and less restrained than the horrors of 1942-1945. A Crash, not Clash would spontaneously drag the planet to its galactic nadir.  Concrete scenarios were delineated, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: